LongCat Model Comparisons

Task-focused comparisons that explain trade-offs between LongCat models and alternatives. All analysis is independent and source-linked.

This site is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Meituan or LongCat.

Open the LongCat-2.0 and Kimi K3: Open-Weight MoE Flagships Compared comparison

LongCat-2.0 and Kimi K3: Open-Weight MoE Flagships Compared

A source-based comparison of LongCat-2.0 (1.6T MoE, MIT License, domestic-ASIC training, $0.30/M input) and Kimi K3 (2.8T MoE, modified MIT License, native vision, $3.00/M input) — the two largest open-weight Chinese models. Covers architecture, licensing, pricing, modalities, and deployment.

Published: 2026-08-04
Open the LongCat-2.0 and DeepSeek V4-Flash: Open-Weight MoE Models Compared comparison

LongCat-2.0 and DeepSeek V4-Flash: Open-Weight MoE Models Compared

A source-based comparison of LongCat-2.0 (1.6T MoE, ~48B active, MIT License, $0.30/M input) and DeepSeek V4-Flash (284B MoE, 13B active, MIT License, $0.14/M input). Covers architecture, pricing, cache economics, deployment, and licensing.

Published: 2026-08-05
Open the LongCat-2.0 and GLM-5.2: Open-Weight MoE Flagships Compared comparison

LongCat-2.0 and GLM-5.2: Open-Weight MoE Flagships Compared

A source-based comparison of LongCat-2.0 (1.6T MoE, ~48B active, MIT License, $0.30/M input) and GLM-5.2 (744B MoE, ~40B active, MIT License, $1.40/M input). Covers architecture, pricing, licensing, coding benchmarks, and deployment.

Published: 2026-08-06
Open the LongCat-2.0 and Claude Fable 5: Open-Weight vs Frontier Closed Model Compared comparison

LongCat-2.0 and Claude Fable 5: Open-Weight vs Frontier Closed Model Compared

A source-based comparison of LongCat-2.0 (1.6T MoE, MIT License, $0.30/M input, self-hostable) and Claude Fable 5 (Anthropic's Mythos-class frontier model, $10/M input, API-only). Covers architecture, pricing, licensing, context, and the June 2026 export-control suspension.

Published: 2026-08-10
Open the LongCat-2.0 and Gemini 3.1 Pro: Open-Weight vs Closed Frontier Flagship Compared comparison

LongCat-2.0 and Gemini 3.1 Pro: Open-Weight vs Closed Frontier Flagship Compared

A source-based comparison of LongCat-2.0 (1.6T MoE, MIT License, $0.30/M input, self-hostable) and Google Gemini 3.1 Pro (preview flagship, natively multimodal, $2/M input with tiered long-context pricing). Covers architecture, pricing, licensing, context, modalities, and deployment.

Published: 2026-08-11
Open the LongCat-Image and Seedream 5.0: Open-Weight vs Closed Image Generation Compared comparison

LongCat-Image and Seedream 5.0: Open-Weight vs Closed Image Generation Compared

A source-based comparison of LongCat-Image (6B bilingual open-weight model, Chinese text rendering, self-hostable) and Seedream 5.0 Pro (ByteDance's closed flagship, 14-language rendering, layer separation, API-only). Covers architecture, text rendering, editing, pricing, licensing, and deployment.

Published: 2026-08-12
Open the LongCat-Video and Seedance 2.5: Open-Weight vs Closed Video Generation Compared comparison

LongCat-Video and Seedance 2.5: Open-Weight vs Closed Video Generation Compared

A source-based comparison of LongCat-Video (13.6B open-weight DiT, 720p/30fps, text/image-to-video, up to 5-minute generations, self-hostable) and Seedance 2.5 (ByteDance's closed video flagship, 30s native output, 50 multimodal references, built-in audio). Covers architecture, duration, resolution, pricing, licensing, and deployment.

Published: 2026-08-14
Open the LongCat-Image and Qwen-Image 2.0: Two Open-Weight Chinese Image Models Compared comparison

LongCat-Image and Qwen-Image 2.0: Two Open-Weight Chinese Image Models Compared

A source-based comparison of LongCat-Image (6B bilingual open-weight model, 8,105-Chinese-character rendering, self-hostable) and Qwen-Image 2.0 (Alibaba's 7B open-weight model, native 2K, unified generation-editing). Covers architecture, text rendering, benchmarks, licensing, and deployment — an open-weight vs open-weight comparison.

Published: 2026-08-16
Open the LongCat-Video-Avatar 1.5 and Kling Avatar 2.0: Open-Weight vs Closed Digital Human Compared comparison

LongCat-Video-Avatar 1.5 and Kling Avatar 2.0: Open-Weight vs Closed Digital Human Compared

A source-based comparison of LongCat-Video-Avatar 1.5 (open-source audio-driven digital human, Whisper Large, 8 NFE, self-hostable) and Kling Avatar 2.0 (Kuaishou's closed digital human, 5-minute clips, 1080p/48fps, platform-only). Covers architecture, duration, resolution, pricing, licensing, and the EvalTalker benchmark.

Published: 2026-08-16
Open the LongCat-Video and Seedance 2.0: Open-Weight vs Closed Video Generation Compared comparison

LongCat-Video and Seedance 2.0: Open-Weight vs Closed Video Generation Compared

A source-based comparison of LongCat-Video (13.6B open-weight DiT, 720p/30fps, up to 5-minute generations, self-hostable) and Seedance 2.0 (ByteDance's closed video model, 4-15s clips, native audio, 480p-1080p). Covers architecture, duration, audio, pricing, licensing, and deployment — the predecessor of Seedance 2.5.

Published: 2026-08-18
Open the LongCat-Image and Seedream 4.5: Open-Weight vs Closed Image Generation Compared comparison

LongCat-Image and Seedream 4.5: Open-Weight vs Closed Image Generation Compared

A source-based comparison of LongCat-Image (6B bilingual open-weight model, 8,105-Chinese-character rendering, self-hostable) and Seedream 4.5 (ByteDance's closed image model, 4K output, 10 reference images, multi-image fusion). Covers text rendering, resolution, editing, pricing, and licensing — the predecessor of Seedream 5.0.

Published: 2026-08-18
Open the LongCat-2.0 and Qwen3.8-Max: Two Chinese Open-Weight MoE Flagships Compared comparison

LongCat-2.0 and Qwen3.8-Max: Two Chinese Open-Weight MoE Flagships Compared

A source-based comparison of LongCat-2.0 (1.6T MoE, MIT License, 1M context, domestic-ASIC training) and Qwen3.8-Max (2.4T MoE, 95B active, custom license with revenue-share clause, open weights released August 12). Covers architecture, licensing, benchmarks, pricing, and deployment — the first LongCat vs Qwen comparison on this site.

Published: 2026-08-20
Open the LongCat-Flash-Omni and DeepSeek V4-Flash-Vision-Exp: Omni-Modal vs Vision-Exp Compared comparison

LongCat-Flash-Omni and DeepSeek V4-Flash-Vision-Exp: Omni-Modal vs Vision-Exp Compared

A source-based comparison of LongCat-Flash-Omni (560B open-weight omni-modal model, MIT License, text+image+audio+video in one framework) and DeepSeek V4-Flash-Vision-Exp (experimental vision model, text parity with V4-Flash, multimodal agent capability near Opus 4.8, API-only). Covers modality scope, benchmarks, pricing, licensing, and deployment.

Published: 2026-08-22
Open the LongCat-Video-Avatar 1.5 and HeyGen: Open-Weight vs Platform Avatar Compared comparison

LongCat-Video-Avatar 1.5 and HeyGen: Open-Weight vs Platform Avatar Compared

A source-based comparison of LongCat-Video-Avatar 1.5 (open-source audio-driven digital human, Whisper Large, 8 NFE, self-hostable) and HeyGen (commercial avatar platform, 175+ languages, 15-second avatar creation, video translation). Covers capabilities, languages, pricing, licensing, and the EvalTalker benchmark.

Published: 2026-08-24
Open the LongCat-Video and Wan 2.2: Two Open-Weight Video Generation Models Compared comparison

LongCat-Video and Wan 2.2: Two Open-Weight Video Generation Models Compared

A source-based comparison of LongCat-Video (13.6B DiT, 720p/30fps, up to 5-minute generations) and Wan 2.2 (Alibaba's open-weight MoE video model, 27B total/14B active, plus 5B consumer-GPU model). Both open licenses; covers architecture, duration, resolution, deployment, and licensing.

Published: 2026-08-24
Open the LongCat-Video-Avatar 1.5 and OmniHuman 1.5: Open-Weight vs Closed Cognitive Avatar Compared comparison

LongCat-Video-Avatar 1.5 and OmniHuman 1.5: Open-Weight vs Closed Cognitive Avatar Compared

A source-based comparison of LongCat-Video-Avatar 1.5 (open-source audio-driven digital human, Whisper Large, 8 NFE, self-hostable) and OmniHuman 1.5 (ByteDance's cognitive avatar, System 1+2 dual architecture, up to 60s output). Covers architecture, duration, multi-person, pricing, licensing, and the EvalTalker benchmark.

Published: 2026-08-26
Open the LongCat-Image and FLUX.2: Open-Weight Image Models Compared comparison

LongCat-Image and FLUX.2: Open-Weight Image Models Compared

A source-based comparison of LongCat-Image (6B bilingual open-weight model, 8,105-Chinese-character rendering, self-hostable) and FLUX.2 (Black Forest Labs' 32B open-weight image family, 4MP editing, 10 reference images). Covers architecture, text rendering, licensing nuances, pricing, and deployment.

Published: 2026-08-26